Do Math Websites Help or Hurt?
The Real Impact of DeltaMath, Khan Academy, IXL, and Friends
If you have a student or have been a student the past 15 years, you have probably heard of various math platforms and even experienced them firsthand. With early pilots from 2008–2013, classroom integration during 2014–2019, and normalization since 2020, students are “doing math on computers” regularly. So, what effect does this have on learning mathematics?
These platforms boost success when they’re used for targeted practice, spaced review, and instant feedback-driven corrections. However, they hurt when they replace thinking with guessing, inflate confidence with endless retries, or misalign with what is taught in class.
What These Tools Can Provide
- Immediate feedback: Students learn faster when mistakes surface instantly.
- Infinite practice: Large problem banks let you drill exactly what’s weak.
- Data trails: Time-on-task, accuracy, and error categories are visible.
- Automation: Less grading overhead, more time for teaching and tutoring.
Risk: The same features enable guessing, overreliance on hints, and shallow pattern-matching.
Positive Impacts (When Used Well)
- Faster error detection: Instant “red/green” lets students correct in the moment.
- Spaced practice: Scheduled sets across weeks lock skills into long-term memory.
- Mastery targeting: You can aim drills at one skill until accuracy stabilizes.
- Low-friction reps: Short sessions are easier to sustain daily.
- Motivation by progress: Streaks, badges, and visible improvement keep students practicing.
Negative Impacts (If You Let Them)
- Guessing with unlimited tries: Accuracy climbs while understanding doesn’t.
- Hint addiction: Students click through solutions instead of attempting.
- False confidence: Scores look fine online, then collapse on paper tests.
- Misalignment: Platform problem styles don’t match classroom assessments.
- Equity & access: Patchy internet, old devices, and reloading can block progress.
- Keyboard math vs pencil math: Without written work, algebra errors never get fixed.
Let’s focus on some of these negative impacts: “Keyboard Math vs. Pencil Math” and “Guessing with Unlimited Tries”.
The Downside of “Infinite Tries” vs Handwritten Work
Unlimited tries teach students to chase green check marks instead of building a method. With endless do-overs, many slip into guess-and-click. They don’t plan, don’t write steps, and don’t diagnose where the error occurred. Platform scores then blur persistence with proficiency, because the final “correct” hides weak first-attempt accuracy. Without handwriting, the micro-skills that raise test grades—clean distribution with negatives, aligning like terms, carrying units, annotating word problems—never get practiced. On paper tests, there are no hints, no retries, and real time pressure; students trained on infinite attempts often see their accuracy collapse when they must produce a complete method once, correctly.
What is a possible solution?
Teachers can cap attempts, require written work on the problems, grade first-attempt accuracy, not just the final green check.
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Assigning 60 minutes of click-through “grind” with no written work
- Grading completion instead of first-attempt accuracy and retention
- Using platforms as punishment, not as targeted practice
- Accepting platform “mastery” badges as proof of paper-test readiness
Measuring Real Success (Not Just App Scores)
- First-attempt accuracy rises and stays above 80% on focus skills.
- Retention checks a week later stay within 5–10% of the original score.
- Transfer performance improves on paper tests and open-response items.
- Time to correct a known error type drops across the month.
If app metrics look great but paper tests don’t move, you have a setup problem, not a student problem.
Bottom Line
Math websites and software can accelerate success, if you set guardrails, require written work, and measure retention instead of screenshots. Use them to automate reps and surface errors quickly. Use paper to prove real understanding. Combine both, and grades move.